While I understand that Richard Hoagland has made a lot of people think about the oddities of the solar system, and that's a good thing, I really have to wonder exactly what this latest post on his site is all about. Am I supposed to seriously consider the supposition that Data, from Star Trek, is stuck on the moon? If he's simply suggesting that there might be some interesting artifacts in various locations on the moon, then fine. I can buy it as a theory to be explored. If he's seriously suggesting that Star Trek is real and Data is on the moon, well, then he might want to lay off the LSD while watching sci-fi, in my opinion. Yes, he suggests that he doesn't care if it was really Data's head, or some other mechanical artifact, but please, someone, tell me why he even suggests that it might be Data's head in the first place...