sorry Joshie, about to go off on a tangent:
so what is better then channeling? the bible?
why does Rev. Dr. Elizabeth MacDonald's crap cost a TON of money?
This is all nonsense imho & i don't trust her.
Quote:
The Gnostic writings are based on first century channeled material, meaning inspired according to the mental capacity of that time. We never encourage our students to read channeled material, but only the teachings of the greatest illumined minds, both present and past.
Since when are "channelers" not illumined?
How does she know who WAS illumined? Those whom used power & war to edit the bible are those we should trust?
She makes errors channeling this letter.
She will never be a healer, mage, or diviner...
psh, the audacity to act as though they do not count. I do not believe in her method of divination simply because she thinks it is fake. How is this faith in god? this is egomaniacal.
Gnosticism is like christianity, their is no REAL version because there never was a correct perspective; anything written by humes is flawed.
To say what she says is ethnocentric bias, pure and almost racist.
Also, does she discount St. John the Baptist then? tell me he wasn't channeling, lol.
Ok, now to really get into it...
What is Christian mysticism? Nothing to do with Hebrew so far it would seem (the true roots of magic in christianity, not to mention zoroastrianism & countless other invaded local traditions) so it would seem?
Mystics who worship jesus have done very little translation & lore research imho. To understand the roots of christian mysticism, the magic that the apostles uses as much as moses or abraham or any prophet (thus the real meaning of messiah) and to still attribute all of it to jesus is idolatry & blasphemy. It may be said that Pagans and Jews know more of "christian mysticism" then 99% of christians.
Quote:
On June 6th, 1971 at 10:30 A.M., her mind melded with the consciousness of God, containing the mysteries of the universe.
what a load of BS. because one moment of time is more valuable then a lifetime... because enlightenment is instantaneous. This seems like western cristian cult practice, pure and simple.
I personally do not hold her opinion valid.
Gnosticism is as much a part of Christian mysticism as the Hebrew language, or acts of healing. Christianity and Gnosticism are simply the two major sides that split after the death of jesus; there were many, man, MANY other sects just as their still are today. exclusion, as a general rule, makes people sound really dumb to me.
Any "mystic" who so casually tosses aside "channelers" and then has no problem reinterpreting the bible onto hours of audio books that cost hundreds of dollars is a hypocrite; writing IS a form of divination in hebrew. wow people are ignorent.
i'd say study THoTH instead Joshie~
It's free, the people are fiercely honest, & exculsion is a rarity.
Mainly I don't like Dr. Liz cause she immediatly discounts what I would consider my ritual practice as a mystic in this style, also then refuting what I believed the new testament to actually be... but magical manuals (especially in the healing arts) SHOULD be difficult to understand. I do not blame her for having ideas about how it was as much as claiming that she has in fact been "saved / enlightened" and neeeds no further education as a prophet. Sadly, within a few moments of personal confrontation she would barely be able to handle my personal energy, let alone casting or biblical bard songs, and i'm a NOOB. she needs an ego death... maybe i should send HER THoTH. rofl. with all of her travels it is suprizing that her narrow opinion hasn't been romped; she obviously does her inquiries more selectivly then she claims.
There are a million ways to do anything.
no one knows your way accept you.
