Quote:

What's keepin' 'em?

Your probably scaring them away.




Sorry, couldn't let that one go.


_________________
"Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens" - Jimi Hendrix

Kira wrote:

Quote:

What's keepin' 'em?

Your probably scaring them away.




Sorry, couldn't let that one go.

I would hope they have more 'cahonies' than that.
Join us.....you know where.

They have cahonies!?

Join..what...huh?


_________________
"Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens" - Jimi Hendrix

Kira wrote:

They have cahonies!?

Join..what...huh?

Alien greys have cahonies? And here I thought they were all sexless.

please ck your pm box.

being an Aussie looks up word cahonies


Looks at add and still me wonder?

Get some cahonies and gulp it down right from the tap. — RobRoy. I agree! ... most people, including myself, and they were written for just that purpose, not to define





To the East for my heart is full like care2

Japanese astronomer believes Planet X will be found. See this thread.

http://www.book-of-thoth.com/ftopicp-178652.html#178652

Could this be conditioning for the real thing (Says the cynical side of me.)?


_________________
"Your body was fashioned many thousands of years ago by genetic scientists."
http://www.book-of-thoth.com/modules/mp3player/emit.htm
http://www.myspace.com/emitrekkert

Very cool find Tiaka!

Whatever has been found and whatever you name it this clearly isn't Nibiru. From that article this seems to be a planet with a "normal" orbit that has always been out there beyond the reaches of Pluto. But this highlights something interesting for me. It answers (to some degree) the question that many have posed: "if Nibiru is "out there" and on it's way in why have the myriad astronomers both professional and amateur not seen it yet?" Here we have a fairly massive object that has always been in our solar system and it is only now being discovered by one isolated team. And there don't seem to be any pictures yet. It really underlines the limitations on our sky-watching abilities. I think the remarkable strides made in discovering illuminated objects like stars and nebulae have given us non-astronomers an inflated sense of what is possible with non-illuminated objects like planets etc.

Could this be "info flow management" in action? I don't know. I doubt this will give anyone a sense of how folks will react to the news of Nibiru. They aren't saying that this is heading our way!

But cool anyway... it just adds to the debate.


_________________
music: www.myspace.com/zingdad
art: www.zingdad.deviantart.com/

Yea i agree, Our forefathers setting themselves up as "gods" might have seemed like the right thing to do.Maybe it was the current earth people that just worshiped them as so, maybe they were forced to take responsibility because they where of a higher evolution than early humans.I dont buy into the "Annunaki" stuff though it just sounds like another word for "Alien" and the "planet X" stuff is fiction to me.If it'll be visible to the naked eye by 08 why hasnt "Hubble" tracked this?

Pledja wrote:

If it'll be visible to the naked eye by 08 why hasnt "Hubble" tracked this?

I imagine things like that are kept on the down-low.


_________________
It's like a koala bear crapped a rainbow in my brain!
I have a Myspace!

IIRC, Hubble is set up to look a lot farther out than our own solar system. It isn't design to be able to see something that close, the same as you couldn't use a pair of binoculars to read a book or watch TV. It would be just a meaningless blur.


_________________
There are monsters, there are angels,
there's a peacefulness and a rage inside us all.
There's sugar, there is salt,
there's ice and there is fire in every single heart.
There are monsters, there are angels.

Any idea why they aren't spraying much over the southern hemisphere? Or do they think its good enough to "shield" half the planet?


_________________

Formally known as Animal_Gurl

I've spent an enjoyable hour reading the entire thread. I'll be checking out all the posted links later. Its been a pleasure to read more about a subject I have been following off and on for nearly 40 years.

And since places like Macchu Piccu, Chinchinitza(sp) and Giza will be crowded like all-get-out on December 23 2012, my intention is to go find a spot on top of the Altiplano and watch the sun set on the old world, and wait for it to rise on the new.

Could be a heck of a party if anybody else shows up.

Animal_Gurl wrote:

Any idea why they aren't spraying much over the southern hemisphere? Or do they think its good enough to "shield" half the planet?

Yeah I have an idea or two. Or rather Adamu did which he shared with me. :-) I posted that here:
http://www.book-of-thoth.com/ftopicp-167656.html#167656
You'll remember it when you see it :-)

Adamu makes the contention that it is only NATO countries that have chem-trails. Since receiving that channelling I have checked it out and it does seem to be true. If it IS true then it makes nonsense of the theory that it is just newer jet technology producing longer-lasting contrails. Newer jets fly over all the skies in the world. It also makes nonsense of the theory that this is a benevolent action o protect the people of the world - unless non-NATO folks don't need protection. So anyway the channelling does have a bit of internal consistency in that area: it is being sprayed over NATO countries because it is being done by the military and these military planes would not be allowed over non-NATO countries. Makes sense?
Adamu makes a contention as to WHY they are being sprayed - I cannot say at all if this is right or wrong. It's all a bit far out. Check it out and decide for yourself, okay?


_________________
music: www.myspace.com/zingdad
art: www.zingdad.deviantart.com/

Ragnarok wrote:

Animal_Gurl wrote:

Any idea why they aren't spraying much over the southern hemisphere? Or do they think its good enough to "shield" half the planet?

Yeah I have an idea or two. Or rather Adamu did which he shared with me. :-) I posted that here:
http://www.book-of-thoth.com/ftopicp-167656.html#167656
You'll remember it when you see it :-)

I re-read that other post, and there's something that doesn't quite add up for me. I don't have a background in science, and perhaps this is a so-called dumb question, so bear with me.

If the purpose of the spraying is to create an ionizable shield to protect satellite communications, why is the spraying done below the orbits of the satellites? Isn't that like saying , my roof will leak when the rains come, so I'll patch up the foundation? Or am I missing something?


_________________
There are monsters, there are angels,
there's a peacefulness and a rage inside us all.
There's sugar, there is salt,
there's ice and there is fire in every single heart.
There are monsters, there are angels.

Hiya Nebs

Thanks for keeping a sharp eye. Channelling is a fiddly business and I keep myself open to the possibility that I can (and do) get stuff wrong. In this instance though I do think the info holds up as it stands. I'll tell you how I understand it and then you can let me know if you disagree. I REALLY don't want to come off as one of those channellers that defends his stuff to the death. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong. It has happened before and I'm sure it will happen again.
But anyway here is what I get from that channelling and why I still think this one is okay:

Quote:

So what does this shell protect against?
...
You may know that sufficient solar-flare activity will result in the failure of electronic and electrical equipment on your planet. The first things to go are your satellites and then, with increased solar flare activity, things like terrestrial radio communication devices are inactivated. Then power generation and transmission equipment also goes as well as land-line communication devices.
...
How impotent will the military be in the above outlined circumstance? No electricity, no transmission of power, no communication, many electronic circuits fried. What will they do if they cannot tell an aircraft to take off or give it guidance where to strike? How will they launch those awful weapons of despite you call nuclear missiles?

(emphases added)
What I understand is that the TPTB are protecting all their own terrestrial electrical and electronic equipment. Satellites will indeed also be destroyed and maybe this is why a secondary function of this sprayed shell is being investigated, viz. communication - as alluded to when he said they experiment in causing

Quote:

... the whole sky to be a communication device for themselves.

So that's how I understand it but once again... I am most open to having folks point out inconsistencies. They do creep in from time to time. It is quite possible for me to distort messages by being conscious and present for the communication and it is STILL a possibility that this whole thing is a grand self-delusion on my part.


_________________
music: www.myspace.com/zingdad
art: www.zingdad.deviantart.com/

Quote:

... the whole sky to be a communication device for themselves.

Ah, now I see. Sort of. As I said, I do not have a background in science, so there are a lot of finer details I won't be able to grasp. But I can understand your basic point now after this explanation.

Thanks so much for this clarification.


_________________
There are monsters, there are angels,
there's a peacefulness and a rage inside us all.
There's sugar, there is salt,
there's ice and there is fire in every single heart.
There are monsters, there are angels.

Thanks again Ragnarok, Don't worry, I'm sure your doing your best. There's so much to this, don't know if we'll ever find out? But I'll die tryin'.

If they could use the sky for communications wouldn't that mean HAARP would have to be involved with it? I know you've been asking about CT's but maybe to get more infor on it by adding what does HAARP have to do with all this might clearify some?

No rush on this Raganrok, whenever you have time.


_________________
"Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens" - Jimi Hendrix