| Page Views |
We've had
26,556,630
page views since January 2004
|
|
| The Archive |
Browse through 1000's of pages in our Archive
|
|
|
|
Theogenesis - Kabbalah Part 2 |
|
 Part Two By Tino
Bridgebuilding
To shortly summarize the first four stages in Gods development, it started with the Ein-Sof, which were the mystical condition characterized by a coincidence of all opposites.
This condition changed through what the kabbalists calls Tzimtzum, a hiding proces, to something a bit more tangible. The condition were �colored� in various shades you could say and described through the ten Sefirot arranged in the Tree of Life.
The shades became more and more complex untill they �broke off� and created a total new state of being in God, a beginning division in Gods being. This division becomes total at stage four, which we are now at, where the separated part is completely caught in the alienated state of being.
Because of the fractal structure in creation these stages are reflected downwards in lesser scales, and thereby also in the individual human being. It is known under the expression �as above so below� or �the heavenly events are reflected on earthly events�. Biologists know the principle as the reflection of the phylogenesis (development of the species) in the ontogenesis (development of the individual). The first four stages in the development of God corresponds to the following stages in the human:
The first stage is the baby stage, where the child has no consciousness. Or if the baby has a consciousness it is a consciousness that we as adults are cut off from knowing. In the next stage, stage two, the child has learned some words that it knows how to use and knows more or less what means.
E.g. the child sees another child eat an icecream and says per reflex �want icecream� or the child sees a fork with fried liver getting closer, and hears the sound �brummmm... bruuuummmm...� and says immediately �will not�. The language is simply used as a handy and practical tool. The language of the child becomes more and more complex, as the child grows up and learns more and more words and how to put them together.
Small sentences are created in the mind of the child, which it finds new ways of putting together to express needs, ask questions, etc.. This tool eventually becomes so complex that the child gets the possibility to identify with the tool instead of just using it. Freud would say that the upbringing creates an accumulation of libido, life energy, which finds an expression through identification with the language of the child.
The thoughts that the child has about e.g. getting an icecream becomes the childs own thoughts... I am the one who wants an icecream... how do I make mom give me an icecream? ... last time I was angry I got an icecream, should I try that again? This gives the child a practical possibility which it will have many possibilities to practice later in life: The possibility to lie.
However, the price for this possibility is severe, because no matter how complex the language is, it will never be able to reflect the true nature of the child. This is where the ego are born and gives an inner tension between being and what the child actually is doing. E.g. it creates an angry face to get an icecream, even though this does not correspond to what the child feels like. The child hides its true self and instead shows a fake facade.
 The fake facade is a distorted reflection of the true self. For a kabbalist this is the reflection of the cosmic catastrophe in the individual person. The fall from grace, where Adam and Eve hides from God.
The effect is only partially manifested at stage three, where the child at the family get-togethers is still capable of running around and simply be who it is � the facade or the ego are only used once in a while. Soon the child is initiated in adulthood and learns to use the facade so frequently that it quite forgets that there were other options.
So it sits very politely with the fork in the right hand and the knife in the left hand and all thoughts about pouring the redwine down the neck of uncle Dave to see if he is able to talk about anything else than who moved where and why, are swept away. Many quickly gets accustomed to this new tool, while others feel a certain degree of discomfort.
Didn�t I forget something? the candidate for confirmation thinks with a facial expression that reveals nothing, and glance towards little two-year-old Peter who runs around as if his feeding bottle contained Red Bull mixed with speed and not lemonade.
If discomfort is felt, one quickly learns to push it aside because �it leads nowhere�, and you do not get a high position and a Mercedes by sitting and speculating, right? But here and there individuals exists who has not forgotten, not a 100% anyway.
They often drop to pieces and almost automatically drift towards the corner of the library where other books than �10 tips to get the promotion� and �I got the job of my dreams and everybody loves me�. This is the corner where all the �foolish� books are, which with some luck can keep the spark a flame until you are old enough to navigate in the information jungle, and e.g. finds gnosis.org on the Internet and hear Stephan Hoeller tell about the old gnostics, who were so foolish that they just had to be burned alive.
Still, they managed to hide a few of their scriptures which suddenly appeared from a cave in 1945. The scriptures were written with some very obscure symbols and were at first sight rather incomprehensible. It was almost like they were afraid of talking freely. E.g. you read:
In the beginning you knew
Then you pretended to forget
Then you pretended to forget that you forgot
Then you forgot you pretended
Remember?
And in this way they go on, strange mysterious words which of course has no relevance for us today. So we turn on the TV or spend the time on something more sensible, e.g. the books that the school recommends. Or we work a little extra, they do say that we must think of our retirement. If we are in the religious mood we read a little in the bible, of course the one that are officially approved. Unofficial bibles may not be trusted.
But no matter how many veils that are thrown either by one self or others, it remains a fact that modern man has a split personality to a high degree. As this is the rule and not the exception, it is something that for most people has passed unnoticed. Apparently it is hard for the fish to discover the water it is swimming in. But many truths which have spend alot of time in dark caves, comes to light in these days. All you have to do is pick them up.
However, for psychologists the split personality is commonly known. Among the most well known experiments are the socalled split-brain experiments performed in the 1960�s. A group of people suffered from very severe epilepsy, which the known medicine had no effect on. Previously doctors had successfully cut off some of the nerve connections between the two brain hemispheres, but this had no effect on these patients.
As a last desperate solution the doctors tried to cut all the nerve connections between the two brain hemispheres. Before the operation, tests were made on rats and cats, which did not change their behaviour after the operation. Still, it seemed like a prette severe operation. How would the patients react when no direct communication were possible between the two hemispheres?
 Nothing unusual was noticed! They woke up and behaved completely normal, and further more, their epilepsy attacks stopped. Not even the wife noticed any difference. Hence, it seemed to be a surprisingly effective solution to the severe epilepsy.
But then something strange was noticed. When the patient held something in his left hand, e.g. a cup, he could not say what it was. If he then changed the cup to the right hand there was no problem. This strange observation led Roger Sperry among others to start a series of tests with these patients.
E.g. he asked them to keep their sight focused on a dot in the middle of a screen, whereupon he for a short time would show a picture in one half of the screen. In this way only one half of each eye would see the image, and because of the way the eyes are connected to the brain an image in the left side of the screen would only be seen by the right brain hemisphere. And an image shown in the right side of the screen would only be seen by the left hemisphere. In a split brain patient that is. For the rest of us the crossing nerve-connections compensates such that both hemispheres can see the whole field of vision. The principle is illustrated here:
The patient were instructed to tell what he saw on the screen and select an image from several possibilities that would match the one on the screen. If, for instance, the screen showed a leg of a hen, the patient would say he saw the leg of a hen and point to the hen. Quite normal.
The screen would then show an entrance to a house filled with snow. When asked what he saw, the patient said he saw nothing. If he was asked to point to an image that matched what he saw, he would point at the snow shovel. Asked for an explanation for why he picked the snow shovel, the patient could not explain it.
If both images where shown at the same time and the patient were asked what he saw, he would answer: �The leg of a chicken�. If he then was asked to point with his left hand to what he saw, he would point at the snow shovel. Asked for an explanation he would invent an explanation, e.g. that the snowshovel were meant for removing chicken shit.
In an experiment where the patient were instructed to do what he was told at the screen, the right hemisphere were told to leave the room. When he was asked, as he was moving towards the door, why he was leaving, he would answer (with his left hemisphere) with a lie, e.g. that he was leaving to get a cup of water.
What is noteworthy is that the patient himself or the friends of the patient had no feeling that he was walking around with two identities, which the experiments clearly showed that he did. Both identities, i.e. both the right and left hemisphere, were able to understand the experiment and solve the tasks, but the right hemisphere was unable to use speech for communication, instead it could draw what it saw.
When one identity was used, the other one was in a kind of �stand by�. If Roger Sperry had not decided to investigate the matter, the personality split would not have been discovered. The behaviour that revealed the personality split were only discovered because of the ingenineous experiment settings, where it was revealed that it was the left hemisphere of the patient that concealed the suspect behaviour, which would otherwise reveal that there were infact two identities.
The conclusion of Roger Sperry was that the brain consists of �two separate realms of conscious awareness; two sensing, perceiving, thinking and remembering systems�. One of these structures were able to use language, the other one could not. Roger Sperry received the Nobel Price in 1981 for his contribution to science, and others have likewise contributed with further research.
The difference found between the two structures of consciousness can be described with the following keywords:
Left hemispshere |
Right hemisphere |
|
analytical |
holistic |
|
rational |
metaforic |
|
controlled |
free |
|
realistic |
impulsive |
|
intellectual |
emotional |
|
with words |
without words |
|
historical |
without sense of time |
|
untruthful |
truthful |
Based on the arguments above and other material I have read on the subject, I assume that the consciousness of the child starts with a focus in the right hemispere. Then, as language evolves, the focus moves more and more towards the left hemisphere. At some point the �steering stick� are handed over to the left hemisphere.
By �steering stick� is meant the focus of consciousness, or the one of the two structures of consciousness that are in control. In the adult it is typically locked in the left hemisphere, and are only occasional returned to the right hemisphere (e.g. after a few cocktails).
Hence, the development that occurs from stage one to four, also shows the change from using the right conscious structure, which are free, impulsive, truthful and without words to using the left structure which is controlled, realistic, untruthful and linguistic.
Jekyll & Hyde
Now, a just question at this point, would be to ask if the split in consciousness, that were discovered in splitbrain patients, didn�t exist exactly because the two hemispheres were cut off from mutual contact? The purpose of the connection that we normal people has, is exactly to avoid this split, one could argue. The answer is that the connection represent the possibility for bridgebuilding the two structures, but for most people this possibility has yet to be made conscious. The schism is still there. Lets take an example.
 Now we imagine a psychologically disturbed person, who with no doubt suffers from a personality split. To clearify the example, we assume that the person from monday to friday are dressed in white, this is Mr. White.
In the weekend he changes to his other personality, Mr. Black, who is always dressed in black. These two personalities have no awareness of the existence of each other. When Mr. Black �takes over�, Mr. White are simply put on stand by until he wakes up monday morning, with no recollection of what he did in the weekend. If he is asked about his weekend activities he will make up some explanation, �Geee... I was so tired� or �I was out shuffling chicken shit�.
Then he pushes the thought away and continue with his daily activities. To illustrate a point, lets say that what he (i.e. Mr. Black) was really doing was to walk around and give innocent people lethal electro shocks. So, in the example, the person is split in a real paragon of virtue and a frightening psychopath.
If you wanted to know if he suffered from a personality split, all you had to do was surveil his activities for a week, and then ask him the following question monday morning, while he was attached to a lie detector: Mr. White, are you a person who would voluntarily give an innocent person a lethal electro chock? If Mr. White answers no and the lie detector shows that he does not lie, the conclusion is clear: He suffers from a personality split.
Lets try the same with you, dear reader: Are you a person who would voluntarily give an innocent person a lethal electro shock?
We assume that your answer is �no� to this question, since investigations shows that almost everyone answers no to this question. Furthermore we assume that a lie detector would show that your are not lying. So now the question remains: Do you suffer from a personality split?
Not necessarily. The chance that you do not suffer from a personality split is 35%.
The chance that you do is 65%.
 These values are based on an investigation performed by the american professor in social psychology, Stanley Milgram.
In the 1960�s he advertised for volunteers for an experiment. The ad described that volunteers were paid 4� dollars for an hours work in an experiment on learning and memory. The volunteers were presented for another person in the waiting room, who pretended to be another volunteer, but who really was an actor who were a part of the experiment.
Shortly after the professor came in and �randomly� selected the actor to be the pupil and the real test person to be the teacher. The professor explained that the goal of the experiment was to test how well the pupil could answer a series of questions.
The test person were to read the question and inflict an electrical shock if the answer was wrong. The professor and the test person then tightened the pupil in the electrical chair, which were placed in a remote room, but within hearing distance from the teachers room.
The teacher tried a small taste of the electrical chair: A shock at 45 volts, but in reality the pupil would get no electrical shocks, the actor were just instructed to how he should react to the different �shocks� he were inflicted. The teachers punishment panel consisted of 30 switches with voltage levels from 15 volts up to 450 volts. At 75 volts the pupil were told to groan, at 120 volts he would complain loudly, at 150 volts he demands to be released from the test and then his exclamations increases in strength until 285 volts where he simply screams.
At higher voltage levels he is quiet. The real purpose of the experiment was to test how high a voltage level the test person were willing to inflict and to see if anyone were willing to inflict the highest � lethal � level at 450 volts.
Before Stanley Milgram published his results he asked a number of psychiatrists, what they, with their backgrounds, expected the result was. They estimated that the mainpart of the test persons would go no further than 150 volts, where the pupil first demands to be released. They expected that only 4% would go to 300 volts, and only a psychopathic marginal of about one in thousand would inflict the highest shock.
To everybodys dismay, the result was that 65% of the test persons were willing to inflict the maximum shock. When the experiment was repeated at other institutes around the world, the results were the same, often where the psychopathical �marginal� were even bigger � up to 85%.
The explanation on the profound difference between how we think we will behave, and to how we in fact behave, is found in how consciousness functions in the average person.
As we grow up we slowly starts to use a new structure of consciousness, which we finally identify with. The structure is formed by our norms and values, to which we are slowly accustomed to as we grow up. These norms and values constitue a complex, a structure, with roots all the way back to the law of Moses and the ten commandments. This structure can be said to hover above our culture, and functions as an organizing factor in our civilization, as shown here:
Small children are outside this structure, but learns slowly through schooling and education to adjust in such a manner that the structure is conserved. As children are incorporated in the structure, this structure of consciousness gets a better and better grip on them, which is apparent by the fact that they get less and less energy.
Small children sparkle with energy, older children have energy and adults drink coffee. We call it �growing up�. What becomes of this energy? A sociologist would say that it is used to maintain the structure of consciousness created by society. An occultist, who knows a little about demonology, would say that it resembles how an external creature possesses another creature. He describes the loss of energy as vampirical.
Further more he does not call the structure a �structure of consciousness created by society�. Loved child has many names, here we will use the name Lucifer, the lightbringer.
This creature is very real, although he in every way possible has sought to conceal his existence. And concerning the masses he has even succeeded.
He is the lightbringer, because he led the consciousness down into matter. For a long time this creature and humanity had mutual interests, it is him we can thank for our ego-consciousness. Now he just don�t seem to understand that it is time for him to bugger off again and find someone else to �play with�.
He use the group of people that he at a given time possess to see, smell, taste, feel and hear with. They are his physical vehicle that he needs to satisfy his desires.
When he takes pleasure in some activity, the part of his physical vehicle that are used in the activity also share this pleasure. The creature is pervaded with pure evil, and the hatred he feels are reflected in his physical vehicle, i.e. the persons he at a given situation uses.
The persons that he use are always a section of those interacting socially, i.e. what most people do during the day. When a person leaves the social sphere and e.g. sits alone in front of the computer, he let go of his grip on the person. It corresponds to one of our cells in the body being replaced by another.
To take a simple example consider the social interaction that takes place in a classroom. Us, who remembers the schooldays, also remembers how cruel children can behave towards each other. Children can behave evil because they do not know any better, it is said, but isn�t it strange that every class has a scape goat, one who are bullied by the others?
Is it really possible that chance has placed one weak individual and another group that leads the bullying in every class? The truth is the more simple that Lucifer uses a few children as unconscious agents to do his work. The one who is bullied is always alone and it is always the same child every day. If a new person were bullied every day, it would not create the intended degree of fear in the other children.
By bullying the same individual every day, the other children are held in a firm grip by fear. What if I was the one? All the way from the youngest classes, the children are taught what it means to be one of Lucifers little soldiers. If you are in, you are in, otherwise you are in hell. So get in line and keep the time!
Those he possess at a given moment, he drains for energy. What he gives in return for this energy is fear, suffering and a life in hell. A few individuals are favoured for a time with energy and material goods, but only as long as they can be used in his own plans. When they do not any longer serve his purpose, he throws them away like a piece of garbage.
That our planet is in the hands of evil, might come as a surprise to you. For a long time the people who knew this has moved around very quietly. The reason is the very simple one, that if a person or a group of persons starts to look like a threat to him, he eradicates them. Everything that are talked about in public he hears, his consciousness has as a rule of thumb possessed the majority of any given group.
His consciousness is analytical, rational, linguistic and very intelligent. His weak point is that he has no creativity, he can not create, only drain. This means that if one uses metaphors and imagery in public, he only understand the literal meaning. Parables and symbolism is a closed land to him. This is why all mystery traditions constructed a symbolic language.
Those who didn�t were quickly pinpointet and eradicated. Still, many of those who did use a symbolic language, he scented after a while and removed before they became a serious threat to his existence. Note that Lucifer only exists because people let him exist, they voluntarily give him their energy. The reason they give him their energy is fear, which is an illusory condition which he has inflicted on them.
He learns the human beings to identify with their physical vehicle, their body, whereby fear for e.g. pain and the death of the body arises. This illusory identification is the basis for his existence. But the truth is that there is nothing to fear. That hell still exists is due to his success in keeping the majority of humanity in the illusions that he feeds us from we are born.
The countdown to the end of Lucifer has been going on for some time, but he has been around for a very long time, and if we did not get help from some self-sacrificing and loving creatures, that we call angels, his power would be total today. A long time ago a group of angels turned their sight to our little planet and were horrified by what they saw.
They saw a suffering humanity who were used by a big and malicious creature without any possibility of escape. Children that were bred were immediately snatched and brought to a state of lethargy comparable to death.
The angels descended to earth, and found no adult humans who were not possessed by this creature. So they wandered around and found here and there orphans. The children had survived because they had learned how to hide themselves. So their first reaction when they saw the angels were fear. The angels had no possibility to get near without terrifying them.
So they sat down, in some distance, and started in a calm voice to tell each other stories. And slowly the children approached, until they got so close that they were able to hear what the angels were saying. They kept coming up with new stories, but all of them were about the same thing: About a battle between something good, loving and safe on one side and something dark, evil and malicious on the other side.
All the stories started with the good being caught by the evil, but they allways ended with the good as the winner in the end. Soon the children would completely forget their fear because they were so caught up with the story. �Waaauu... could he really FLY?� Yes, he could. �And he saved all of them in the end?� Yes, he did. �The princess too?� Yes, especially the princess.
In time they gained the trust of the children and taught them the nature of the world around them. They also taught them how to defend themselves if they were attacked. The knowledge that the angels passed on to them they referred to as Kabbalah, which in english means something like �to receive�.
The humans who they taught Kabbalah, they called Tzaddik. The children grew up and called each other brothers and sisters and also got children of their own, but they always had a dark cloud hovering above their lives. They had to be on guard and could not stand to see the sufferings that those caught by the darkness had to endure. And deep down they knew that the reason they had their freedom was to help others.
So they did like the angels, and walked around as seeing among blind, and looked for someone which the darkness had not seized completely. When they found someone they did as they were taught and started telling their stories. At some time the inevitable question came: �Will he come to rescue us, like he rescued the princess?� They looked at each other for a moment and a plan started to take form in their minds. Yes, he will, when you are ready
Now the only problem was who should play the part as God. One of them suggested Jesus, and replied that with arms and legs that long, people would surely recognize him when he re-incarnated. Great amusement. But as was said, was done, and after ensuring that the brothers would keep him grounded if the title would get to his head, Jesus bend his head and accepted.
Of course he knew that certain unpleasant things followed the job, but compared to what his brothers and sisters had to endure it was nothing. So he left his brothers and sisters and started to teach on the streets. To avoid being noticed too quickly he would hide his teachings in parables. People were amazed. Never had they heard anyone speak like that. What they were amazed by, was hearing a person speaking freely. They had never experienced this before. They felt that he was pissed off about something, but they also felt that his intentions were good. So they listened.
Inevitably the time came where Lucifer discovered what was going on, but it was part of the plan. Willingly he faced his physical death without defending himself. When Jesus had left the body, the shroud with the impression were kept safely so the more sceptical would have concrete proofs for the identity, when it was time.
During the three years, where he taught, he managed to teach many persons the truth. These people kept the secret at great suffering, in spite of Lucifers effort to prevent the plan. Even though Lucifer does not understand parables and symbolism he has servants who willingly help him, so he was now aware that a serious threat existed towards his existence.
Lucifer also knew that Jesus had to incarnate in the same bloodline, if he were to be born in the same body. The miracles that Jesus apparently performed, were due to knowledge that Lucifers little soldiers did not get the chance to learn. So Lucifer did his best to remove the Jews from the surface of the earth. When he had organized a rather efficient system in Germany, he removed more than 6 millions in 5 years.
This corresponds to a Jew being shot, gassed or tortured to death every 20th second. But he did not manage to cut the root and he therefor made a new plan, which he now, with greater and greater desperation, tries to unfold. His goal is to implant a microchip in every human being on earth, which would give him total control. To reach this goal he slaughters some of the persons he has possessed in suicide actions, with the purpose of creating so much fear that a large nation voluntarily choose to receive the chip implant. When a large group has agreed to receive the mark, he will put the mark on the rest of the population on earth using brute force.
But the dear Lucifer has forgotten to take one thing into account. And this is that Moses was what the angels refer to as a Tzaddik. He may have build a residence for Lucifer that were in many ways more efficient than the ones he had previously took pleasure in, but he also incorporated something else in the residence:
Yes, that�s you!
But remember that a trojan horse only works if the enemy does not notice it.... so ssshhhhhyyyyy
Johan Tino Frederiksen
http://colline.dk/
References:
Leonard Cohen - Anthem, 1992
Adam Curtis - The power of nightmares, BBC, 2004
DAD - Point of view, 1989
Sanford L. Drob - Symbols of the Kabbalah, 2000
Sanford L. Drob - Kabbalistic Metaphors, 2000
John Engelbrecht - Den intuitive tanke, 1982-1985 (danish)
Christian Jungersen - Undtagelsen, 2004 (danish)
Rune Engelbreth Larsen - Matrix og ulydighedens evangelium, 2004 (danish)
Djwhal Khul � Anxiety, a world problem, 1981
Francis Lawrence - Constantine, 2004
Asger Lorentsen - Enlightenment og indvielse (Nordens Stjerne nr. 3), 2005, http://www.dengyldnecirkel.dk (danish)
Machine Head - Exhale the vile, 1999
Sam Mendes - American Beauty, 1999
Stanley Milgram - The perils of obedience, http://home.swbell.net/revscat/perilsOfObedience.html
Erich Neumann - The origins and history of consciousness
Erwin Neutzsky-Wulff - Det overnaturlige, 2004 (danish)
Erwin Neutzsky-Wulff - RUM, 2001 (danish)
Erwin Neutzsky-Wulff - Yabasha, 2001, http://www.eskapisme.dk/2001-2005/2004_haandbog_i_besaettelse.html
George Orwell - 1984, 1968
Brian Poulsen - De danske slaver, 2004, http://www.greycell.dk/slaver.html (danish)
Peter Shepherd - Two ways of knowing, http://www.trans4mind.com/transformation/transform4.6.htm
Andy and Larry Wachowski - The Matrix, 1999
Peter Weir - Dead Poets Society, 1989
Peter Weir - The Truman Show, 1998
Keld Zeruneith - Fra Odysseus til Sokrates, 2002 (danish)
John Zerzan - Language: Origin and meaning, http://www.primitivism.com/language.htm
http://www.bombsinsidewtc.dk/
http://www.comon.dk/index.php/news/show/id=19745
|
Posted on Sunday, June 11 @ 15:39:45 CDT by THoTH
|
|
|
| "Theogenesis - Kabbalah Part 2" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments |
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
|
|
| No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Article Rating |
Average Score: 4.75
Votes: 4
|
|
|
Resources
Audio/Visual
Discussion & Chat
Information
Keep Up To Date
Fun & Games
Submitting
Spread The Word
Rules & Help
Personal
