By Tisha Lee

I remember the day I went into the hospital to give birth to Robert. It was March 14, 1989 and you would think it was a summer day. It was warm and the sun was shinning. I was excited to see what this beautiful baby that shared the same birthday with Albert Einstein would share with the world.

At three months old Robert loved to eat but was unable to drink a full bottle of formula without throwing up. The pediatrician changed Roberts’s formula several times and recommended a strict feeding schedule. Being a young new Mom, I really did not think it was abnormal for a newborn baby to take three hours to finish four ounces of formula. It was obvious he was hungry but all the effort it took for him to finish one bottle was exhausting. My constant complaints to the doctor fell on deaf ears.

By THoTH

In hospital recently, I was reading through my medical notes. Inside was a form relating to my overall health status. Inside of that was a section for “Belief” giving the medical assessor the decision on whether my view was irrational. It made me think, my first reaction was “who defines irrational”? Surely their view would be heavily influenced by their own belief, which in itself could be construed by some as irrational.

Thus began my thinking on “official rationality”. The thought of that made me feel uneasy. Whether we like it or not, our thoughts and views regarding subjects like UFOs can be seen to be officially (according to psychiatry) irrational. If for example I'd started discussing UFOs with my hospital assessors, I'm sure there'd have been a few raised eyebrows, maybe even a lower mark on my overall “mental health”.

Why?

By ThothMosesIII aka MAD

Shaken, not Stirred:

-MAD: Phil, it’s great to speak with you again, thanks for taking some time with me today. You were my very first interview a few years back and it seems fitting that it’s come full circle and we should have a new discussion. You’ve been up to a lot in the last couple of years, with your latest work ‘THE BOND CODE’ hot off the presses. I understand you just got back from filming on a new documentary as well. Would you care to let the readers in on some of the new projects you’ve got in the works, and what might we expect from you in the upcoming year? I understand that the Knights of Malta and the lore of Count Dracula are amongst the subject of future books?

By Kraken

The Thelemic tradition of Aleister Crowley is openly connected to demonolatry (worship of demonic entities or negative astral entities). For my post here I'll use one popular Thelemic homepage but you can find this kind of material repeated time and time again throughout the Thelemic and other Crowley related traditions.

Image One
Image Two

Symbols of the Gnostic Church of the O.T.O.

This is a material of both the "mainstream" O.T.O. and the "Gnostic and Catholic Church" (the name of an organization, as those who have done good research will know name doesn't always matter really to determine whether something is demonic or not, although it's sometimes obvious). In this case it's not obvious at all since you can't relate "Gnostic", "Catholic" or "Church" to anything demonic. Many gnostics have been very benevolent but people have to look beyond the packagings to learn the true nature of things.

By Anonymous

Oh, Highest Authority, bless you for helping my friends and I create the War on Terror. For without it, where would we find all of the drones we need? Our lackeys, our workers, our monkeys, our associates, our slaves, where would they all be if the War on Terror was never created? 

Yes, God, bless your golden heart for the War on Terror. Not to be forgotten though, bless your golden heart for Capitalism as well-the dog-eat-dog system which gave us the foundation of fear for which to install the War on Terror in the first place.

Thank you for all of your guidance, Lord, for without it, we would have a much harder time trying to keep all of these two-legged animals on a leash. Without your guidance, only you would know how we would go trying to make them trust us, and actually believe that we really cared about them. Spying on them, dividing them, making them aggressive towards eachother, these are things that we could have never done without your approval. And again, as I speak for not only myself, but for the other guys as well, thank you, my Lord!

By T Stokes

LondonÂ’s ultra posh Lancaster Gate hotel, long the Mecca for intelligence services Christmas dinners, this year provided something so sinister and so anti-British, that hope exists it does not progress past the proposal stages. 

The idea is for a major U S Christian church to invest initially 90 million pounds In a huge Christian based theme park in East Anglia extolling the virtues of creationism.

There will be large coin operated religious statues, which will tell biblical stories, lecture halls, scenic night time laser shows, a T V station and film making facilities, a memorial park for deceased relatives, and a large school summer camp facility for youngsters and students, with a hospital and recuperative center.

Notes on Dowsing - Article by Brian May

These notes have been prepared for those wishing to obtain a basic understanding of dowsing. It is not my intention to present these notes as hard and fast facts, but rather encourage their use as a guide, and perhaps encourage the reader to undertake further study.

It is absolutely essential each of us develop techniques, interpretations and an understanding, which suit our own belief systems and reality. 

I must stress that the ethics associated with dowsing are fundamental to achieving any level of consistency. In these notes you will find heavy emphasis is placed on ethics and attunement. It is essential that each of us develops and refines our own unique personal process that will help us enter the essential state of attunement.

By ThothMosesIII

To Dream the Impossible Dream 

An Interview with Kevin Todeschi of the Edgar Cayce A.R.E. Center
MAD- www.nwowatcher.com

“Be a light unto others, not boastful of self.”
~Edgar Cayce

"Open the door for those that cry aloud for a knowledge that God is within the reach of those that will put their hand to doing!"
~Edgar Cayce

By entity

This is far from new...BUT..with all that we do know now..With all that has come forth from government people and agents as well as the public..We know 9/11 was planned out by the American government against it's own nation, well before that fateful day in New York City..

This is only a small part of what took place..and what the intentions were.

Stepping back in recent history..
As the time grew closer to the planned attack, things took on an obvious monetary scheme.

By SolAris

For many millennia various philosophers and other misfits with little else to do have broken their heads over the question of whether it is semantically proper for a single person to ever use the plural pronoun "we", when describing his own actions.

Some say that one should not be "semantically allowed" to say things like "we view this negatively" or even "we'll see you later" - because such statements are logically meaningless. A person can speak only for himself, he has absolutely no control over what others do, and can't force them to agree with his actions or views, either in the past or in the future. Therefore it would be a fallacy to include anybody else in what you are saying really about yourself.