|
We have received 31,943,563 page views since December 23, 2003 |
|
Browse through 1000's of pages in our Archive

|
|
|
By Gerald O'Donnell
My dear brothers and sisters, a stupendous event has started since April 2004, where the old Matrix which had been our Thought and Reality construct since eons is being slowly dismantled. Many of its old rigid structures and informational grids are in the process of crumbling down and are moving within very fluid and bendable systems.
Its central core is being carefully transmuted and cleansed. This is of course not yet necessarily apparent to most, but it is a reality that all of you will experience in an accelerated fashion during your lifetime and the future of this and many more Creations.
The old constructs are still being witnessed but have been greatly weakened at their core of any durable strength.
|
|
|
|
By Gerald O'Donnell
A great shift is in the making: A time for very deep purification and cleansing from the inner core within ourselves and within the Earth up to the outer manifest reality. How this will all play out is our choice.
Many will understand the need for inner and outer focus on unity and love. However, many others will remain under the grip of their programmed old ways and thus experience this world with much fear while focusing on dis-unity.
This is a time where our greatest force shall emerge from its hidden inner recesses as we face our greatest challenge: a transformation and trans-evolution of mankind when our thought processes transmute from a harsh concentration on lack toward a gentler constant awareness of the beauty and unity of all within the ONE that we all are here to manifest.
|
|
|
|
 By Sol
Towards the middle of the 20th Century a novel and original system of thought arose, which was to have far-reaching implications on today's thinking patterns. It was a philosophical theory whose precise didactic argumentation was not readily accessible to laymen, which caused it to remain in the musky realm of scholars and tenured Humanities professors. It had furthermore been criticized as being an incomplete and distorted picture of our reality, and has been largely discounted in its original form by the philosophy establishment, except as a curious historical trend.
Thus the influence of this theory has mostly escaped public notice. And yet from its inception, it had been used by its proponents for such a wide range of pursuits as treating shell-shocked soldiers or stopping college riots. It has also spawned several very interesting "cult-like" doctrines, such as Dianetics. Most curiously, many of this theory's tenets have been accepted for granted in the New Age era, though in an entirely different way than what its creator envisioned.
|
|
|
|
by John Jay Harper (www.johnjayharper.com)
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (John 1:1, KJV)
Former U.S. Marine and author Edward Arnold asks in 2012: Year of the Apocalypse, “After 2012, will the people of the world be ready to rely … on themselves … be ready to understand that the ‘power of god’ is within one’s own self?”
By all indications, we are walking a slippery slope, teetering on the edge of the abyss right now. There are more than enough doom and gloom forecasts. Yet is that because we give our self-will power away to prophets, priests, physicians, and politicians? Of course it is, but why is it that some of us don’t do that?
|
|
|
|

By Sol
The recent amazing film rendition of the great Lord of the Rings saga has captivated the imagination of people throughout nearly our entire world. This is already a third generation inspired by this work, and it has been very gratifying to experience it much more powerfully now, through this new transformative medium.
A great deal has been written about the mythological origins of this epic, and the historical symbolic significance of many of its notions and characters. The very concept of the Nine Companions who formed the Fellowship of the Ring should sound immediately familiar to a researcher of the esoteric. Many other symbolic and arcane references are given in the story, some greatly amplified even beyond Tolkien's original meaning, through the incredibly talented effort of director Peter Jackson and the screenwriters.
Leaving the specific symbolism aside for the moment though, there is one important aspect of the tale which has largely escaped wide public notice, most likely because it's not very pleasant to think about. Yet the particular parallel which is being drawn is possibly the most significant part of this work's underlying message.
|
|
|
|
 Article Source - The Times Online
THE scientist who led the team that cracked the human genome is to publish a book explaining why he now believes in the existence of God and is convinced that miracles are real. Francis Collins, the director of the US National Human Genome Research Institute, claims there is a rational basis for a creator and that scientific discoveries bring man “closer to God”.
His book, The Language of God, to be published in September, will reopen the age-old debate about the relationship between science and faith. “One of the great tragedies of our time is this impression that has been created that science and religion have to be at war,” said Collins, 56.
|
|
|
|
‘Da Boss’ has asked me to write a little bit on how a ‘lightworker’ such as myself, actually perceives the world right now. So here is a brief account of my experience.
Firstly, I am a bridge-builder. I stand with one foot in both worlds, the old and the new. This explains why I sometimes feel torn apart mentally, as the old (ego based) tries to drag me back and the new (Spirit based) tries to move me forward.
I watch for fellow seekers who thirst for a truth they cannot quite remember and I try to direct them into the new with my words and actions. It’s not easy and the old sometimes drags me back! But I get up and try again. So how does the world appear to me? That depends on which side of the bridge I stand.
|
|
|
|
Article Source - American Chronicle
A question often asked to pick someone’s brain is If You Could Have Any Power In The World What Would It Be? The answer to that question has varied over the years. I’ve listed the choices with their pros and cons below.
PERFORMING MITOSIS LIKE A GERM. Pros: Your copies could help you with chores and errands. They could go to work for you while you relax at home, and then bring you the money. They could help with expenses and moving, and back you up if you’re threatened by a group of thugs.
Cons: You and your copies would probably fight over car keys, bathroom time, store items, romantic partners and everything else imaginable. Mitosis also might be just a tad excruciating. Also, would your copies be autonomous or would they be mindless robots on standby while awaiting your commands?
|
|
|
|
Article Source - ABC News How You Use Your Brain May Determine How Healthy -- or Unhealthy -- It Is
Use it or lose it. We know that about our bodies.
But a growing line of research now shows that the same is true for our brains.
How we live, and what we do, can actually have a profound impact on the physical structure of the brain.If we are what we eat, as the old saying goes, we may also be what we think. Or how we think, as well as how much we think.
|
|
|
|
Article Source Reason Online
Will neuroscience revolutionize our understanding of law and morality? If so, can law and morality be saved? That was the question posed by a June conference at the American Enterprise Institute on “The New Neuromorality.”
Despite being held under conservative auspices, the event had an entirely secular perspective. The only overt references to religion were tinged with irony, and the only theoconservatives on hand were in the audience. Yet some of the decidedly nonobscurantist speakers voiced support for concerns that in today’s public discourse are often seen as faith-based.
In her talk on the moral challenges posed by brain enhancement and brain imaging, University of Pennsylvania neuroscientist Martha J. Farah sympathetically cited the warnings of Leon Kass, the conservative chairman of the President’s Council on Bioethics, that some advances in this area may undermine intrinsic human worth.
|
|
|
| |